From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24113 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 12:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 24100 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 12:44:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:44:43 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/17122] Unable to compile friend operator within template Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00848.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17122 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-12 12:44:13 UTC --- Are any of the examples in this PR actually valid? I think G++ is correct to reject them. foo ::operator+ is parsed the same as foo::operator+ so still finds the member function, the parentheses prevent that.