From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 19A36384B80F; Wed,  6 Jan 2021 13:11:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19A36384B80F
From: "anthonysharp15 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17314] Error message wrongly shows declared rather than
 inherited access
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:11:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anthonysharp15 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-17314-4-3iu6LkeIoZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-17314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-17314-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:11:49 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17314

--- Comment #23 from Anthony Sharp <anthonysharp15 at gmail dot com> ---
The patch is now on the mailing list
(https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562835.html).

Please take my last comment with a pinch of salt ... I was mainly trying to=
 sum
up what has already been said. There are plenty of people here who have much
more knowledge than I do and if they say that something is the case, it
probably is.

Also just to be clear when I said that no-one uses virtual private inherita=
nce,
that obviously isn't strictly true. What I meant to say was that no one wou=
ld
realistically use a virtual private inheritance, and then try to derive ano=
ther
class from it, which is what the problem is.=