From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16050 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2011 12:58:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 16040 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2011 12:58:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:57:56 +0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:58:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00934.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #113 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-09 12:56:20 UTC --- As you've probably seen, I've cleaned up and tested Marc's patches over the weekend, threw some more testing (Solaris 8/9/10) in yesterday, and posted the results to gcc-patches etc.: [java, libjava] Allow C++ compilation with Solaris headers http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00832.html [c++] Keep tm, div_t, ldiv_t, lconv mangling on Solaris (PR libstdc++-v3/1773) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00834.html [fixincludes] Allow properly defining __cplusplus with Solaris headers (PR libstdc++-v3/1773) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00833.html [v3] Use Solaris prototypes if possible (PR libstdc++-v3/1773) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00835.html [libcpp] Correctly define __cplusplus (PR libstdc++-v3/1773) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00837.html Many thanks to Marc for his hard work to make this a reality. I just think it's easier to discuss the separate issues in their own threads on the proper mailing lists, rather than on bugzilla. Rainer