From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25017 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2010 00:09:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 25004 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2010 00:09:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:09:13 +0000 From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.3.6 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01061.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 --- Comment #48 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-12-10 00:08:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) > WONTFIX means GCC devs don't want a fix. Not quite, and saying it that way, sends the wrong message. It's more like "are not going to put resources (of their own) into fixing it".