public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-18501-4-vqpri8v80E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ppluzhnikov at google dot
                   |                            |com

--- Comment #61 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 18:46:59 UTC ---
*** Bug 56972 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-420350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 18:47:03 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-420350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10577 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 18:47:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10381 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/56972] Missing "may be used uninitialized" warning for "obvious" uninitialized
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-56972-4-vrFwdk4oOD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01495.txt.bz2
Content-length: 837


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56972

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 18:46:59 UTC ---
Infamous PR18501. With:

~/test1/197214/build/gcc/cc1 -Wall -Wextra -O1 pr56972.c -fdump-tree-all-lineno

you can see that pr56972.c.020t.copyrename1 contains the uninit use but
pr56972.c.021t.ccp1 has removed it.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 18501 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-420352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 19:37:33 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-420352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2993 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 19:37:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2929 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2013 19:37:29 -0000
From: "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/56921] [4.9 Regression] ICE in rtx_cost called by doloop_optimize_loops for PPC
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56921-4-1WkjFTMhiK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01497.txt.bz2
Content-length: 708


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idV921

--- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 19:37:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Created attachment 29877 [details]
> > patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect
> >
> > Patch papering over (restoring non-GC collect) attached.  Not exactly the
> > best solution as garbage is then again not collected during the in some
> > cases memory expensive passes.
>
> Fixes ICE while building libgfortran for arm-*-*.
> Also, no regressions on arm-none-eabi tested with qemu.

This also fixes the testsuite failures and numerous spec build failures on
powerpc.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-15 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-09 14:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 15:26 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
2010-12-09 16:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 16:35 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 17:04 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
2010-12-09 18:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-10  0:09 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-10  1:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-06 20:40 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-06 21:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 12:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 16:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04  8:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 13:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 13:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 22:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 23:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 23:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-15 18:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-02-16 13:12 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-03-13 18:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-13 18:03 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
2014-06-12 13:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23  8:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-29 15:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-07 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-15 23:05 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14  9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-18501-4-vqpri8v80E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).