public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-18501-4-vqpri8v80E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppluzhnikov at google dot | |com --- Comment #61 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 18:46:59 UTC --- *** Bug 56972 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >From gcc-bugs-return-420350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 18:47:03 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-420350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10577 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 18:47:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10381 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/56972] Missing "may be used uninitialized" warning for "obvious" uninitialized Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution Message-ID: <bug-56972-4-vrFwdk4oOD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-56972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-56972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01495.txt.bz2 Content-length: 837 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56972 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 18:46:59 UTC --- Infamous PR18501. With: ~/test1/197214/build/gcc/cc1 -Wall -Wextra -O1 pr56972.c -fdump-tree-all-lineno you can see that pr56972.c.020t.copyrename1 contains the uninit use but pr56972.c.021t.ccp1 has removed it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 18501 *** >From gcc-bugs-return-420352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 19:37:33 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-420352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2993 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 19:37:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2929 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2013 19:37:29 -0000 From: "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/56921] [4.9 Regression] ICE in rtx_cost called by doloop_optimize_loops for PPC Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-56921-4-1WkjFTMhiK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-56921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-56921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01497.txt.bz2 Content-length: 708 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idV921 --- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 19:37:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Created attachment 29877 [details] > > patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect > > > > Patch papering over (restoring non-GC collect) attached. Not exactly the > > best solution as garbage is then again not collected during the in some > > cases memory expensive passes. > > Fixes ICE while building libgfortran for arm-*-*. > Also, no regressions on arm-none-eabi tested with qemu. This also fixes the testsuite failures and numerous spec build failures on powerpc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 18:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-12-09 14:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-09 15:26 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com 2010-12-09 16:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-09 16:35 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-09 17:04 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com 2010-12-09 18:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-10 0:09 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-10 1:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-06 20:40 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-06 21:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-27 12:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-27 16:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 8:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-13 13:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-02 13:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 22:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 23:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 23:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 15:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15 18:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-02-16 13:12 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com 2014-03-13 18:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-03-13 18:03 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com 2014-06-12 13:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-19 13:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-23 8:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-29 15:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-07 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-15 23:05 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-18501-4-vqpri8v80E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).