From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 389 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2010 11:25:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 373 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2010 11:25:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:25:34 +0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/18635] use of uninitialised reference accepted in C++ front end X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg03232.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-26 11:25:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > int &a = a; > > > i don't believe this is valid code. i believe g++ should reject the code. > > > > I'm not convinced the compiler must reject it. EDG accepts it too. > > Without warning? What about clang 2.8? Yes, without warning (G++ at least warns) I don't know about clang