public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed
[not found] <bug-19104-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-08 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-09 15:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-08 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-08 20:47:39 UTC ---
Related to PR 19105 and PR 46309
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed
[not found] <bug-19104-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-08 20:48 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-09 15:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-09 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Even at -O we now generate the same code for both range1 and range2, so I
suppose we can enunciate that this one is fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed
2004-12-21 11:42 [Bug tree-optimization/19104] New: " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-12-21 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-07-26 13:14 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-26 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 19104 depends on bug 21445, which changed state.
Bug 21445 Summary: [meta-bug] we need a reassociate pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21445
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed
2004-12-21 11:42 [Bug tree-optimization/19104] New: " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19104] " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:44 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 13:14 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 15:54 -------
Again (this is really the same problem as 19105):
Fold unlike simplify_rtx does not do as re-association (or really as much as re-association).
Oh, forgot to say why, because we call fold a lot more than simplify_rtx.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-21 15:54:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed
2004-12-21 11:42 [Bug tree-optimization/19104] New: " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19104] " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 11:44 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 13:14 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 11:43 -------
Created an attachment (id=7792)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7792&action=view)
assembly at -O2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed
2004-12-21 11:42 [Bug tree-optimization/19104] New: " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-21 11:43 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:44 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-21 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 11:43 -------
Created an attachment (id=7791)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7791&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-09 15:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19104-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-08 20:48 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19104] in range test not noticed pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-09 15:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2004-12-21 11:42 [Bug tree-optimization/19104] New: " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/19104] " nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 11:44 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-21 15:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-26 13:14 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).