public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
[not found] <bug-19205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-02-25 23:16 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-26 0:18 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2011-02-26 4:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-25 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-25 23:13:35 UTC ---
No response from m68k maintainers for more than 5 years.
This just clutters my bug searches. WONTFIX seems the most logical "way out".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
[not found] <bug-19205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-25 23:16 ` [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices steven at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-26 0:18 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2011-02-26 4:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2011-02-26 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2011-02-25 23:58:10 UTC ---
Not a reason to close them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
[not found] <bug-19205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-25 23:16 ` [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-26 0:18 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2011-02-26 4:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-26 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-26 00:17:56 UTC ---
Also fine, not closed. Great to see that you pay enough attention to stop the
reporter from closing his own PRs. I wish you would be just as fast with
actually doing something about them. It is not even clear whether these
problems still exist!
If this still not OK with you, I suggest you do something about these 15+ years
old problems, or close these and re-file under your own account. They may not
bother you but I don't want them anymore in my list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
[not found] <bug-19205-280@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-02-12 22:03 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-12 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-12 22:03 -------
Waiting for a m68k maintainer to do something here...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
2004-12-30 12:21 [Bug target/19205] New: " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-01-31 0:18 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-06-19 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-19 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 14:55 -------
Confirmed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-19 14:55:06
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
2004-12-30 12:21 [Bug target/19205] New: " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-31 13:35 ` [Bug target/19205] " schwab at suse dot de
2005-01-31 0:15 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-01-31 0:18 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-06-19 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-01-31 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-01-31 00:18 -------
Oops, stupid bugzilla interface.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
2004-12-30 12:21 [Bug target/19205] New: " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-31 13:35 ` [Bug target/19205] " schwab at suse dot de
@ 2005-01-31 0:15 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-01-31 0:18 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-06-19 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2005-01-31 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-01-31 00:15 -------
The hammer branch still does not exhibit the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
2004-12-30 12:21 [Bug target/19205] New: " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-12-31 13:35 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-01-31 0:15 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2004-12-31 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-26 0:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-25 23:16 ` [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-26 0:18 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2011-02-26 4:40 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
[not found] <bug-19205-280@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-02-12 22:03 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-30 12:21 [Bug target/19205] New: " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-31 13:35 ` [Bug target/19205] " schwab at suse dot de
2005-01-31 0:15 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-01-31 0:18 ` schwab at suse dot de
2005-06-19 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).