From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-348451-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25105 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2011 00:18:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 25073 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Feb 2011 00:18:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:18:27 +0000
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/19205] [m68k] avoid converting INDEX to SI mode if a narrower mode suffices
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status
Message-ID: <bug-19205-4-h5n1O8C9Rv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-19205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-19205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 04:40:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg02917.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19205

Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |SUSPENDED

--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-26 00:17:56 UTC ---
Also fine, not closed. Great to see that you pay enough attention to stop the
reporter from closing his own PRs. I wish you would be just as fast with
actually doing something about them. It is not even clear whether these
problems still exist!

If this still not OK with you, I suggest you do something about these 15+ years
old problems, or close these and re-file under your own account. They may not
bother you but I don't want them anymore in my list.