public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/19476] Missed null checking elimination with new Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-19476-4-Q108a1Mpth@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-19476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19476 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I posted a patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00676.html However, note that it only optimizes the testcase from this PR if we add #include <new> at the beginning, otherwise the implicit declaration of operator new doesn't have its operator_new_flag set...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 13:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-19476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2013-09-06 16:14 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-06 17:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-09-11 13:20 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2013-09-11 14:14 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-03 16:14 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-03 23:48 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-03 23:57 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-11 11:48 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org [not found] <bug-19476-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2005-11-12 20:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-13 1:24 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-11-13 2:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-13 2:13 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2005-11-13 2:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-13 2:51 ` sabre at nondot dot org 2006-01-09 18:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-08 21:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-10 23:33 ` ian at airs dot com 2005-01-17 4:54 [Bug c++/19476] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 8:37 ` [Bug c++/19476] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 15:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-20 6:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-04 15:40 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-19476-4-Q108a1Mpth@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).