public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Missing diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier [not found] <bug-19538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2011-05-05 1:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-08 15:50 ` [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Bogus " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-29 16:23 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-05 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-05 00:56:11 UTC --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#407 is no longer open, I think [2] should be accepted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Bogus diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier [not found] <bug-19538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-05-05 1:11 ` [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Missing diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-08 15:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-29 16:23 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-08 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|accepts-invalid, diagnostic |rejects-valid Status|SUSPENDED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2005-10-02 21:02:16 |2020-7-8 Summary|[DR 407] Missing diagnostic |[DR 407] Bogus diagnostic |for typedef name in |for typedef name in |elaborated type specifier |elaborated type specifier --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Un-suspending, and changing from accepts-invalid to rejects-valid. Both [1] and [2] are valid now and should be accepted. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Bogus diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier [not found] <bug-19538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-05-05 1:11 ` [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Missing diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-07-08 15:50 ` [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Bogus " redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-29 16:23 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-10-29 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19538 Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |diagnostic --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Un-suspending, and changing from accepts-invalid to rejects-valid. > > Both [1] and [2] are valid now and should be accepted. Still a diagnostic issue even it's now rejects-valid instead of accepts-valid, IMO. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-29 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-19538-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-05-05 1:11 ` [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Missing diagnostic for typedef name in elaborated type specifier redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-08 15:50 ` [Bug c++/19538] [DR 407] Bogus " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-29 16:23 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).