public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-02-23 22:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-24  0:59 ` ami at fischman dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-23 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ami at fischman dot org

--- Comment #28 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-23 22:08:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 47864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-02-23 22:13 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-24  0:59 ` ami at fischman dot org
  2011-06-27 13:45 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ami at fischman dot org @ 2011-02-24  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

--- Comment #29 from Ami Fischman <ami at fischman dot org> 2011-02-23 23:35:45 UTC ---
Further reduced test case from dup bug 47864:
$ nl t.cc ; g++ -finstrument-functions -Wreturn-type -Werror -c t.cc
     1  int foo(int type) {
     2    switch(type) {
     3      case 0: return 1; break;
     4      default: return 0;
     5    }
     6  }
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
t.cc: In function ‘int foo(int)’:
t.cc:6: error: control reaches end of non-void function

(in 4.4.3)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-02-23 22:13 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-24  0:59 ` ami at fischman dot org
@ 2011-06-27 13:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-11-15 14:20 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " dimhen at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.3.6                       |4.4.7

--- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:13:05 UTC ---
4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-06-27 13:45 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-11-15 14:20 ` dimhen at gmail dot com
  2011-11-15 15:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dimhen at gmail dot com @ 2011-11-15 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

--- Comment #31 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko <dimhen at gmail dot com> 2011-11-15 14:10:33 UTC ---
gcc -Wreturn-type -c r.c
r.c: In function 'bar':
r.c:8:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]

enum foo { e_1 };
int bar(enum foo x)
{
    switch(x) {
    case e_1:
    return 0;
    }
}

gcc version 4.7.0 20111115 (experimental) [trunk revision 181378] (GCC)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-11-15 14:20 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " dimhen at gmail dot com
@ 2011-11-15 15:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-11-16  9:28 ` dimhen at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-11-15 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

--- Comment #32 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-15 14:53:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> gcc -Wreturn-type -c r.c
> r.c: In function 'bar':
> r.c:8:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
> 
> enum foo { e_1 };
> int bar(enum foo x)
> {
>     switch(x) {
>     case e_1:
>     return 0;
>     }
> }


Not a bug, enum foo can have other values except e_1.

What happens if you call bar( (foo)1 ) ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-11-15 15:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-11-16  9:28 ` dimhen at gmail dot com
  2012-01-13 19:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dimhen at gmail dot com @ 2011-11-16  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

--- Comment #33 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko <dimhen at gmail dot com> 2011-11-16 09:04:40 UTC ---
> Not a bug, enum foo can have other values except e_1.
> 
> What happens if you call bar( (foo)1 ) ?

sorry for noise :(
You are right - no error in c#31


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-11-16  9:28 ` dimhen at gmail dot com
@ 2012-01-13 19:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-13 20:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-01-13 19:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-13 20:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-13 20:22 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

--- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 20:06:25 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 13 20:06:16 2012
New Revision: 183161

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183161
Log:
    PR c++/20681
    * semantics.c (finish_break_stmt): Avoid adding an unreachable
    BREAK_STMT.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wreturn-type-7.C
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-01-13 20:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-13 20:22 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-03-13 13:41 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |4.7.0
            Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7            |[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]
                   |Regression] wrong "control  |wrong "control reaches"
                   |reaches" warning with       |warning with switches
                   |switches                    |

--- Comment #35 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 20:17:50 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.7.  Could backport if there's interest.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-01-13 20:22 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-13 13:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-07-02 13:34 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-10-15 23:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.4.7                       |4.5.4

--- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 12:45:56 UTC ---
4.4 branch is being closed, moving to 4.5.4 target.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-03-13 13:41 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-02 13:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-10-15 23:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.5.4                       |4.6.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/20681] [4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches
       [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-07-02 13:34 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-15 23:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-10-15 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|4.6.4                       |4.7.0

--- Comment #37 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-10-15 23:53:18 UTC ---
Closing as fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-15 23:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-20681-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-23 22:13 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-24  0:59 ` ami at fischman dot org
2011-06-27 13:45 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-15 14:20 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " dimhen at gmail dot com
2011-11-15 15:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-16  9:28 ` dimhen at gmail dot com
2012-01-13 19:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 20:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 20:22 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.4/4.5/4.6 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 13:41 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 13:34 ` [Bug c++/20681] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-15 23:53 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).