public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted
[not found] <bug-21120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-03 10:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-01-03 14:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-07 16:21 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-01-03 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-01-03 10:24:07 UTC ---
I think the reason we are not erroring out is that, eg the first snippet, is
parsed like:
struct A {};
void foo() { struct A; }
which is fine (and my guess is consistent with the int case).
In any case, typeof is a very old extension (now obsoleted by decltype in C++)
and we have been accepting the syntax for such a long time, I don't think we
really want to "fix" this anyway. Closing?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted
[not found] <bug-21120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-03 10:24 ` [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2012-01-03 14:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-07 16:21 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-03 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-03 14:55:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In any case, typeof is a very old extension (now obsoleted by decltype in C++)
> and we have been accepting the syntax for such a long time, I don't think we
> really want to "fix" this anyway. Closing?
Agreed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted
[not found] <bug-21120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-03 10:24 ` [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-01-03 14:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-07 16:21 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-07 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
--- Comment #5 from Volker Reichelt <reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-07 16:21:08 UTC ---
Well, "decltype" has the same problems, so I opened a new bug report, see
PR51786.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted
2005-04-20 9:56 [Bug c++/21120] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 18:56 ` [Bug c++/21120] " bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2005-05-02 19:09 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net @ 2005-05-02 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-05-02 19:09 -------
Subject: Re: Empty declaration with typeof accepted
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Confirmed. Funny enough, icc accepts the code as well...
would there be compilers union consipracy? ;-)
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted
2005-04-20 9:56 [Bug c++/21120] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-02 18:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-05-02 19:09 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-05-02 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-05-02 18:56 -------
Confirmed. Funny enough, icc accepts the code as well...
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-02 18:56:39
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21120
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-07 16:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-21120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-03 10:24 ` [Bug c++/21120] Empty declaration with typeof accepted paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-01-03 14:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-07 16:21 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-04-20 9:56 [Bug c++/21120] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-02 18:56 ` [Bug c++/21120] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2005-05-02 19:09 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).