From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2273 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2012 15:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 2264 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2012 15:55:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:55:10 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/21374] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE with nested function Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, monitored X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.4.7 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Known to fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg01280.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374 Richard Guenther changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Known to fail| | --- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-11 15:53:51 UTC --- On the trunk, when optimizing, we now inline the nested function and optimize everything away. Adjusted testcase: int main (int argc, char **argv) { int size = 10; typedef struct { char val[size]; } block; block b; block __attribute__((noinline)) retframe_block () { return *(block *) &b; } b=retframe_block (); return 0; } which makes this a dup of PR8081. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 8081 ***