public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-01-08 16:35 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 14:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-08 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2008-10-03 23:54:40 |2011-02-06 23:54:40
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |vmakarov at redhat dot com
Known to fail| |4.6.0
--- Comment #44 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-08 16:21:07 UTC ---
Seems that even in IRA world we made no progress
jh@evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc> ./xgcc -B ./ -O3 reg.i
jh@evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc> tim e./a.out
If 'tim' is not a typo you can run the following command to lookup the package
that contains the binary:
command-not-found tim
bash: tim: command not found
jh@evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc> time ./a.out
1000.8
real 0m5.179s
user 0m5.176s
sys 0m0.000s
jh@evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc> gcc-4.3 -O3 reg.i
jh@evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc> time ./a.out
1180.8
real 0m5.195s
user 0m5.192s
sys 0m0.000s
jh@evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc>
-fno-tree-pre -fno-inline -fschedule-insns makes no difference
Adding vladimir to list as it is partly RA issue
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-08 16:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-27 14:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-23 13:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " wbrana at gmail dot com
` (19 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7
--- Comment #45 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:14:28 UTC ---
4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-08 16:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 14:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-23 13:28 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
2011-07-23 13:54 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
` (18 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: wbrana at gmail dot com @ 2011-07-23 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #46 from wbrana <wbrana at gmail dot com> 2011-07-23 13:25:44 UTC ---
-O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -march=core2 -funroll-loops -fno-tree-pre
4.4.6 - 1730.9
4.5.2 - 2368
4.6.1 - 2205.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-23 13:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " wbrana at gmail dot com
@ 2011-07-23 13:54 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
2012-03-03 23:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: wbrana at gmail dot com @ 2011-07-23 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #47 from wbrana <wbrana at gmail dot com> 2011-07-23 13:53:46 UTC ---
-O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -march=core2 -funroll-loops
4.4.6 - 1522.8
4.5.2 - 1502.6
4.6.1 - 1418.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-07-23 13:54 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
@ 2012-03-03 23:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-05 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-03 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |32120
--- Comment #48 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-03 23:51:36 UTC ---
I noticed PR 32120 is also involved.
D.1716_7 = k_4 * 8;
D.1717_9 = array_8(D) + D.1716_7;
D.1718_10 = *D.1717_9;
k_11 = k_4 + 1;
D.1720_12 = k_11 * 8;
The D.1720_12 should be converted to D.1716_7 + 8.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-03 23:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-05 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 15:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-05 5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #49 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-05 05:29:54 UTC ---
PR 37242 is also needed from what I remember reading the IR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-05 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-13 15:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 11:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.5.4
--- Comment #50 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 12:47:54 UTC ---
4.4 branch is being closed, moving to 4.5.4 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-13 15:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-02 11:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-12 12:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " wbrana at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4
--- Comment #51 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-02 11:45:51 UTC ---
The 4.5 branch is being closed, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-02 11:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-12 12:33 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
2012-08-13 8:29 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: wbrana at gmail dot com @ 2012-08-12 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #52 from wbrana <wbrana at gmail dot com> 2012-08-12 12:30:21 UTC ---
This bug celebrated 7th anniversary this year. Congratulations!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-12 12:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " wbrana at gmail dot com
@ 2012-08-13 8:29 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
2013-01-15 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: wbrana at gmail dot com @ 2012-08-13 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #53 from wbrana <wbrana at gmail dot com> 2012-08-13 08:26:13 UTC ---
It seems it was improved.
4.8 20120806
NUMERIC SORT : 1543.7 : 39.59 : 13.00
4.8 20120813
NUMERIC SORT : 2007.8 : 51.49 : 16.91
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-13 8:29 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-15 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-15 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #54 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-15 14:40:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #48)
> I noticed PR 32120 is also involved.
>
> D.1716_7 = k_4 * 8;
> D.1717_9 = array_8(D) + D.1716_7;
> D.1718_10 = *D.1717_9;
> k_11 = k_4 + 1;
> D.1720_12 = k_11 * 8;
>
>
> The D.1720_12 should be converted to D.1716_7 + 8.
For this the straight-line strenght-reduction pass now does
<bb 5>:
_8 = i_6 * 8;
_10 = array_9(D) + _8;
_11 = *_10;
i_12 = i_6 + 1;
_13 = _8 + 8;
_14 = array_9(D) + _13;
_15 = *_14;
replacing i_12 * 8 with _8 + 8. The association / CSE opportunity is
undetected (maybe it makes sense to schedule pass_strength_reduction
before the 2nd pass_reassoc?).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-15 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-12 15:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4
--- Comment #55 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 15:17:01 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.4 has been released and the branch has been closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-12 15:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-12 13:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #56 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #57 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23 8:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.3
--- Comment #58 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.9/5/6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-23 8:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #59 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.9/5/6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #71 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #72 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #73 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #74 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [11/12/13/14 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #75 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-21485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-08 16:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 14:47 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-23 13:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " wbrana at gmail dot com
2011-07-23 13:54 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
2012-03-03 23:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-05 5:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 15:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 11:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-12 12:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " wbrana at gmail dot com
2012-08-13 8:29 ` wbrana at gmail dot com
2013-01-15 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?88/9/10/11/12 suck jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21485] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).