public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-01-05 17:57 ` jrt at worldlinc dot net
  2012-01-13 22:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-06-15 23:18 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jrt at worldlinc dot net @ 2011-01-05 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210

John T <jrt at worldlinc dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jrt at worldlinc dot net

--- Comment #15 from John T <jrt at worldlinc dot net> 2011-01-05 17:47:45 UTC ---
Using gfortran for gcc-4.4.5 on i686 Linux, compiled here with
glib-2.7-something on Mandriva 2008.1, I got the following error while
compiling files for an old program. I looked at the gfortran source around line
4781 of varasm.c, but don't know enough to make any suggestions about the
problem. The only observation I have is that the preceding if statement assures
that pos doesn't equal totalbytes, so the >= operator shouldn't need the = in
the assert argument. I don't know what statement sets the size of the data
block (and its size).

gfortran   -c -o mind.o mind.f
mind.f:457: internal compiler error: in output_constructor, at varasm.c:4781

line 454+ of mind.f contains the statements
     return
     end
c---------------------------------------------------------
     block data general
c---------------------------------------------------------
c
     common /grid/grid_on


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-01-05 17:57 ` [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness jrt at worldlinc dot net
@ 2012-01-13 22:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-06-15 23:18 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
         AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org  |unassigned at gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu.org

--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 22:21:20 UTC ---
No longer looking into this.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-01-05 17:57 ` [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness jrt at worldlinc dot net
  2012-01-13 22:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-15 23:18 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-15 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210

Bud Davis <bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #17 from Bud Davis <bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Closing due to no clear problem defined.  If more info is available, please
re-open.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-03 18:07 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-05  3:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-05  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-05 03:25 -------
1 year has gone by again.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-01-03 17:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-03 18:07 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-02-05  3:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-03 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-03 18:05 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> Maybe this weekend :).  I guess I have been really behind on my FSF bugs.

Yearly reminder.
Any progress here? :)


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-10-04 21:44 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-01-03 17:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-03 18:07 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-02-05  3:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-03 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-03 17:42 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> So, did you have time? :-)

Maybe this weekend :).  I guess I have been really behind on my FSF bugs.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-09  8:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-04 21:44 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-01-03 17:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-04 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-04 21:44 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Ok, I guess I blew looking at this for a year.  Too busy with work really :).
> Anyways maybe next weekend.

So, did you have time? :-)


-- 

tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-09-18  6:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-09  8:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-10-04 21:44 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-09  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-07-09 08:06 -------
Ok, I guess I blew looking at this for a year.  Too busy with work really :).
Anyways maybe next weekend.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-06-13 19:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-18  6:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-07-09  8:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-18  6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-18 06:58 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Where did this one go to? Can we close it?
> 
> It is still funny looking code. I might take a look this weekend or on June 27
> when I am traveling to the GCC summit.
> 
...and did you? *smile*

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-06-08  7:18 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
@ 2006-06-13 19:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-09-18  6:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-13 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-13 18:55 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Where did this one go to? Can we close it?

It is still funny looking code. I might take a look this weekend or on June 27
when I am traveling to the GCC summit.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-01-03 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-01-05 17:05 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-08  7:18 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
  2006-06-13 19:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr @ 2006-06-08  7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr  2006-06-08 06:54 -------
Where did this one go to? Can we close it?

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-01-03 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-05 17:05 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-06-08  7:18 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-05 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-05 17:04 -------
Assigning to Andrew Pinski because I wont be able to work on this for a while.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|steven at gcc dot gnu dot   |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |org                         |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
       [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-01-03 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-01-05 17:05 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-03 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-03 18:45 -------
Steven, I am assigning this from your suse account (one which does exist any
more) to your @gcc.gnu.org account, if you don't have the time to look into
this again, can you assign it to me as I was looking into it and semi saw what
was wrong but I did not know if you had a patch or not to fix this.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|stevenb at suse dot de      |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
  2005-06-27 23:33 [Bug fortran/22210] New: " giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-07-09 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-18  6:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-18  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-18 06:15 -------
Isn't this fixed or did the output_constructor part never get committed?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
  2005-06-27 23:33 [Bug fortran/22210] New: " giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-06-27 23:46 ` [Bug fortran/22210] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-29 22:04 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-07-09 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-18  6:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-07-09 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-09 16:46 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-07-09 16:46:58
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
  2005-06-27 23:33 [Bug fortran/22210] New: " giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-06-27 23:46 ` [Bug fortran/22210] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-06-29 22:04 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
  2005-07-09 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-09-18  6:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2005-06-29 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2005-06-29 22:04 -------
Created an attachment (id=9175)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9175&action=view)
Current CONSTRUCTOR patch

As per Steven's request in private mail, I attach the current patch to make
CONSTRUCTOR use VECs.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness
  2005-06-27 23:33 [Bug fortran/22210] New: " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2005-06-27 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-06-29 22:04 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-27 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-27 23:46 -------
This is not the first time I have seen this in both the Ada and gfortran front-ends.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-15 23:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-22210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-01-05 17:57 ` [Bug fortran/22210] gfc_conv_array_initializer weirdness jrt at worldlinc dot net
2012-01-13 22:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-15 23:18 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
     [not found] <bug-22210-253@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-01-03 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-05 17:05 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-08  7:18 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2006-06-13 19:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-18  6:58 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-09  8:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-04 21:44 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-03 17:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-03 18:07 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-05  3:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-27 23:33 [Bug fortran/22210] New: " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-06-27 23:46 ` [Bug fortran/22210] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-29 22:04 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2005-07-09 16:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-18  6:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).