public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
       [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-11 14:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-11 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-01-11
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-11 14:09:05 UTC ---
Is this still an issue?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
       [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2012-01-11 14:09 ` [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
  2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-01-11 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-11 14:53:57 UTC ---
On 1/11/2012 9:09 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is this still an issue?
I'll have to check.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
       [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2012-01-11 14:09 ` [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-14  7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2012-01-11 00:00:00         |2012-01-13 0:00

--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 23:10:28 UTC ---
I see the following additional fails when GCC 4.7 is configured with
--with-arch=2.0:

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -O2 -flto
-fno-use-linker-pl
ugin -flto-partition=none 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution,  -O2 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugi
n -fno-fat-lto-objects 
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O0  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O1  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O2  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -Os  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=none  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c  -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects  execution test

Will try to debug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
       [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-14  7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14  7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 04:54:23 UTC ---
This is a binutils bug.  Single word conversions need to
use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently
generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd.

This doesn't fail for PA1.1 because the instruction isn't
available.  On the 64-bit target, the right half of the
floating point register is always used for word operands
forcing the 0E opcode.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
       [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-01-14  7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 21:17:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a binutils bug.  Single word conversions need to
> use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently
> generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd.

Changed my mind.  The same code doesn't fail on HP-UX.  This
appears to be a Linux kernel bug as the instruction seems
to be emulated.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
       [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-15 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-15 19:04:53 UTC ---
Have kernel patch.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-15 19:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-11 14:09 ` [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14  7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).