* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
[not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-11 14:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-11 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-11
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-11 14:09:05 UTC ---
Is this still an issue?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
[not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-11 14:09 ` [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-01-11 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-11 14:53:57 UTC ---
On 1/11/2012 9:09 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is this still an issue?
I'll have to check.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
[not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-11 14:09 ` [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-11 14:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-11 00:00:00 |2012-01-13 0:00
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 23:10:28 UTC ---
I see the following additional fails when GCC 4.7 is configured with
--with-arch=2.0:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O2 -flto
-fno-use-linker-pl
ugin -flto-partition=none
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O2 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugi
n -fno-fat-lto-objects
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O1 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -Os execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=none execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/fp-int-convert-float.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
Will try to debug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
[not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-13 23:22 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-14 7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 04:54:23 UTC ---
This is a binutils bug. Single word conversions need to
use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently
generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd.
This doesn't fail for PA1.1 because the instruction isn't
available. On the 64-bit target, the right half of the
floating point register is always used for word operands
forcing the 0E opcode.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
[not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-14 7:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 21:17:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a binutils bug. Single word conversions need to
> use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently
> generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd.
Changed my mind. The same code doesn't fail on HP-UX. This
appears to be a Linux kernel bug as the instruction seems
to be emulated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]
[not found] <bug-22473-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-14 23:50 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-15 19:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-15 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-15 19:04:53 UTC ---
Have kernel patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread