From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16042 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2013 15:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16000 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2013 15:40:10 -0000 From: "sandra at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/23623] volatile keyword changes bitfield access size from 32bit to 8bit Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.0.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sandra at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623 --- Comment #17 from Sandra Loosemore --- Updated patch series: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02057.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02058.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg02059.html Unfortunately, it seems that fixing bugs with -fstrict-volatile-bitfields has been blocked by disagreement between global reviewers and target maintainers who can't agree on whether the C/C++11 memory model should take precedence over target-specific ABIs by default. :-(