public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe
[not found] <bug-24194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-11 14:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-11 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-11
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-11 14:44:03 UTC ---
And the remaining one now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe
2005-10-04 18:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-20 11:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-20 17:57 ` amylaar at spamcop dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at spamcop dot net @ 2006-07-20 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2006-07-20 17:57 -------
Subject: Re: emit_input_reload_insns secondary
reload handling is unsafe
Quoting pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 11:19
> -------
> Isn't this really fixed by the TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD target hook?
reload_adjust_reg_for_temp checks only the first hard register for suitability
wrt. NEW_CLASS.
I.e. we check TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (reg_class_contents[(int) new_class], regno) ,
but for a two-hard-reg register we'd also have to check
TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (reg_class_contents[(int) new_class], regno) .
AFAICT the other issues in this PR have been addresssed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe
2005-10-04 18:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-20 11:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-20 17:57 ` amylaar at spamcop dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-20 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 11:19 -------
Isn't this really fixed by the TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD target hook?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24194
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-11 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-24194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-11 14:44 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-10-04 18:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-20 11:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/24194] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-20 17:57 ` amylaar at spamcop dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).