From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-163403-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22688 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2005 01:02:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22665 invoked by uid 48); 24 Oct 2005 01:02:54 -0000
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:02:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/24497]  New: internal compiler error: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2122
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-24497-6527@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg03101.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

long long foo(void)
{
  long long unsigned s=0;
  long long unsigned b;
  for (b = 0; b++, s == 0; )
    {
      s = b;
    }
  return s;
}

Compiled with -O2 -funroll-all-loops gives

internal compiler error: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2122

The problematic line is:

gcc_assert (rtx_equal_p (PATTERN (insn), PATTERN (orig_insn)));

And PATTERN(insn) is

(parallel [
        (set (reg/v:DI 32 [ b ])
            (plus:DI (reg/v:DI 32 [ b ])
                (const_int 1 [0x1])))
        (clobber (scratch:SI))
    ])

This fails because rtx_equal_p thinks the two (scratch:SI) are different
scratch registers, and returns 0.


-- 
           Summary: internal compiler error: in apply_opt_in_copies, at
                    loop-unroll.c:2122
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-checking
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: m68k-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24497