public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation
@ 2005-11-02 20:34 toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:36 ` [Bug fortran/24643] " toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl @ 2005-11-02 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
gfortran issues an "Unclassifiable statement" error when trying
to compile a statement with concatenation of substrings of
character variables.
--
Summary: Unclassifiable statement on character substring
concatenation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
@ 2005-11-02 20:36 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl @ 2005-11-02 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2005-11-02 20:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=10114)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10114&action=view)
Test case for this bug
Test case added.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:36 ` [Bug fortran/24643] " toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
@ 2005-11-02 20:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 20:42 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 20:39 -------
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-11-02 20:39:10
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:36 ` [Bug fortran/24643] " toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-02 20:42 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:13 ` [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 20:42 -------
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/gcc> ../gcc/build/gcc/f951 -quiet -fsyntax-only
Warning: Reading file '<stdin>' as free form.
PROGRAM TABLES
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y)
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
END
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/gcc> ../gcc/build/gcc/f951 -quiet -fsyntax-only
Warning: Reading file '<stdin>' as free form.
PROGRAM TABLES
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y)
WRITE(YLOCAL,'(I2.2)') ILOCAL
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
END
In file :4
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/gcc> ../gcc/build/gcc/f951 -quiet -fsyntax-only
Warning: Reading file '<stdin>' as free form.
PROGRAM TABLES
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y)
ybtable='b'
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
END
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/gcc> ../gcc/build/gcc/f951 -quiet -fsyntax-only
Warning: Reading file '<stdin>' as free form.
PROGRAM TABLES
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y)
WRITE(YLOCAL,'(I2.2)') ILOCAL
ybtable='b'
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
END
In file :5
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/gcc> ../gcc/build/gcc/f951 -quiet -fsyntax-only
Warning: Reading file '<stdin>' as free form.
PROGRAM TABLES
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y)
WRITE(YLOCAL,'(I2.2)') ILOCAL
ybtable='b'
YBTABLE=Ylocal
END
schluter@pcl247d:~/src/gcc>
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-02 20:42 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-02 21:13 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 22:12 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:13 -------
g77 groks this:
$ cat grg.f
PROGRAM TABLES
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y)
WRITE(YLOCAL,'(I2.2)') ILOCAL
YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2)
END
$ g77 grg.f
$
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |19292
nThis| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-02 21:13 ` [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-02 22:12 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 19:34 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-02 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 22:12 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> ...
I forgot to say that these are all syntactically valid variations of the same
theme.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-02 22:12 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-03 19:34 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-05 11:51 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl @ 2005-11-03 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2005-11-03 19:34 -------
Mine ! All Mine !
--
toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |toon at moene dot indiv dot
|dot org |nluug dot nl
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-11-02 20:39:10 |2005-11-03 19:34:54
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-03 19:34 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
@ 2005-11-05 11:51 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-07 23:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl @ 2005-11-05 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2005-11-05 11:51 -------
I got some preliminary results from debugging.
By -fdump-parse-tree, YLOCAL does have the correct (implicitly
determined) type of CHARACTER*8 at statement "YLOCAL='A'".
However, by the time we reach gfc_match_rvalue for the next
statement "YBTABLE=YLOCAL(1:2)" its type is BT_UNKNOWN.
So something has to squash the correctly determined type.
How does one find out ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-05 11:51 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
@ 2005-11-07 23:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-07 23:43 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-07 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 23:29 -------
We get to "check_substring:" in match_varspec:
PROGRAM P
IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8 (Y)
YLOCAL='A'
YBTABLE=YLOCAL(1:2)
END
check_substring:
if (primary->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
{
switch (match_substring (primary->ts.cl, equiv_flag, &substring))
{
case MATCH_YES:
if (tail == NULL)
primary->ref = substring;
But at this point, while we have matched YLOCAL in the second assignment, we
still haven't picked up a type for it. So primary->ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN and
we never even try to match the substring.
I'm not sure if YLOCAL should have just picked up a type earlier. Thoughts,
Tobi?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-07 23:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-07 23:43 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2005-11-08 20:55 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de @ 2005-11-07 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-11-07 23:43 -------
Subject: Re: Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed
character substring
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 23:29 -------
> We get to "check_substring:" in match_varspec:
>
> PROGRAM P
> IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8 (Y)
> YLOCAL='A'
> YBTABLE=YLOCAL(1:2)
> END
>
> check_substring:
> if (primary->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
> {
> switch (match_substring (primary->ts.cl, equiv_flag, &substring))
> {
> case MATCH_YES:
> if (tail == NULL)
> primary->ref = substring;
>
> But at this point, while we have matched YLOCAL in the second assignment, we
> still haven't picked up a type for it. So primary->ts.type == BT_UNKNOWN and
> we never even try to match the substring.
>
> I'm not sure if YLOCAL should have just picked up a type earlier. Thoughts,
> Tobi?
It should have picked up a type in the first assignment. Why it doesn't, I
don't know. Apparently, the failure is conditional on the facts that A) there
already exists a symbol and B) this symbol doesn't have a type at that point.
I'll look into this in more depth tomorrow. I remember that last time I
looked into these issues (back before Jakub fixed PR18833), I noticed that the
matching of primaries had been completely reworked in g95, and I can't think
of any other bug relating to that than this one, so this bug might well turn
out to be a snake pit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-07 23:43 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
@ 2005-11-08 20:55 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-08 23:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-08 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 20:55 -------
Correction: implicit types are only assigned during resolution. The issue is:
why does it reject the second statement if the RHS object already exists, but
not otherwise?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-08 20:55 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-08 23:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 21:49 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-08 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 23:58 -------
Patch posted.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|toon at moene dot indiv dot |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
|nluug dot nl |
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortra
| |n/2005-11/msg00255.html
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-08 23:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-10 21:49 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-10 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 21:49 -------
Subject: Bug 24643
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Nov 10 21:49:29 2005
New Revision: 106753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106753
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/24643
* primary.c (match_varspec): Check for implicitly typed CHARACTER
variables before matching substrings.
testsuite/
PR fortran/24643
* gfortran.dg/implicit_6.f90, gfortran.dg/implicit_7.f90: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_6.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_7.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:15 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-10 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 23:10 -------
Subject: Bug 24643
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Nov 10 23:10:51 2005
New Revision: 106757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106757
Log:
Backport r106753
fortran/
PR fortran/24643
* primary.c (match_varspec): Check for implicitly typed CHARACTER
variables before matching substrings.
testsuite/
PR fortran/24643
* gfortran.dg/implicit_6.f90, gfortran.dg/implicit_7.f90: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_6.f90
- copied unchanged from r106753,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_6.f90
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_7.f90
- copied unchanged from r106753,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_7.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/fortran/primary.c
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-10 21:49 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:15 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-10 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 23:11 -------
Fixed.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-10 23:15 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-10 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 23:15 -------
*** Bug 22048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |h dot j dot j dot vandam at
| |dl dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-10 23:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-02 20:34 [Bug fortran/24643] New: Unclassifiable statement on character substring concatenation toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:36 ` [Bug fortran/24643] " toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-02 20:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 20:42 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 21:13 ` [Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-02 22:12 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-03 19:34 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-05 11:51 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-11-07 23:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-07 23:43 ` Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2005-11-08 20:55 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-08 23:58 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 21:49 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:11 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-10 23:15 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).