* [Bug bootstrap/24859] Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
@ 2005-11-14 19:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-14 20:26 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-14 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 19:55 -------
Using GNU binutils 2.14 20030612, also compiled myself.
That is your bug. binutils is not complete for AIX 5 support at all.
rs6000 is there because that is the name of the target directory which supports
rs6000 and PowerPC 32/64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
2005-11-14 19:56 ` [Bug bootstrap/24859] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-14 20:26 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
2005-11-16 16:18 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jgoerzen at complete dot org @ 2005-11-14 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jgoerzen at complete dot org 2005-11-14 20:26 -------
I am retrying this build with IBM ld and as.
If memoery serves, I had to install GNU binutils because IBM binutils caused
trouble with version 3.3.2. I will post a comment here when the build is
complete (or fails, whichever comes first).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
2005-11-14 19:56 ` [Bug bootstrap/24859] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-14 20:26 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
@ 2005-11-16 16:18 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
2005-11-16 16:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jgoerzen at complete dot org @ 2005-11-16 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jgoerzen at complete dot org 2005-11-16 16:18 -------
Well, it got farther, but then it died with literally hundreds of messages like
this:
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
class 111 for .text symbol `_ZTSN10__cxxabiv117__pbase_type_infoE'
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
class 111 for .text symbol `_ZTSN10__cxxabiv119__pointer_type_infoE'
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
class 111 for .text symbol `_ZTSN10__cxxabiv129__pointer_to_member_type_infoE'
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
class 111 for .text symbol `_ZTSv'
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
class 111 for .text symbol `_ZTSPv'
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
c
Followed by hundreds of messages like this;
ld: 0711-201 SEVERE ERROR: External symbol vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__function_type_info, defined in member tinfo2.o
of archive ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a, was not found in
the archive's global symbol table.
ld: 0711-201 SEVERE ERROR: External symbol vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__enum_type_info, defined in member tinfo2.o
of archive ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a, was not found in
the archive's global symbol table.
ld: 0711-201 SEVERE ERROR: External symbol vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__pbase_type_info, defined in member tinfo2.o
of archive ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a, was not found in
the archive's global symbol table.
ld: 0711-201 SEVERE ERROR: External symbol vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__pointer_type_info, defined in member tinfo2.o
of archive ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a, was not found in
the archive's global symbol table.
ld: 0711-201 SEVERE ERROR: External symbol vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__pointer_to_member_type_info, defined in member tinfo2.o
of archive ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a, was not found in
the archive's global symbol table.
ld: 0711-201 SEVERE ERROR: External symbol
__cxxabiv1::__pbase_type_info::__pointer_catch(__cxxabiv1::__pbase_type_info
const*, void**, unsigned int) const, defined in member tinfo2.o
of archive ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a, was not found in
the archive's global symbol table.
collect2: ld returned 12 exit status
make[4]: *** [libstdc++.la] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/jgoerzen/programs/gccbuild/objdir/powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/jgoerzen/programs/gccbuild/objdir/powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0/libstdc++-v3'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/jgoerzen/programs/gccbuild/objdir/powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0/libstdc++-v3'
make[1]: *** [all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jgoerzen/programs/gccbuild/objdir'
make: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
--
jgoerzen at complete dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jgoerzen at complete dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-16 16:18 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
@ 2005-11-16 16:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-18 19:01 ` [Bug bootstrap/24859] SEVERE ERROR " jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-16 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 16:19 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well, it got farther, but then it died with literally hundreds of messages like
> this:
That is because GNU ld does not work fully for AIX 5 with weak symbols. So you
have to remove GNU ld also.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] SEVERE ERROR bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-16 16:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-18 19:01 ` jgoerzen at complete dot org
2005-11-18 20:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jgoerzen at complete dot org @ 2005-11-18 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jgoerzen at complete dot org 2005-11-18 19:01 -------
I have completely obliterated every possible GNU ld from the system now, and am
still getting the SEVERE ERROR I posted as the most recent item.
Please note that the 0711-201 means that this is absolutely coming from the AIX
ld. GNU ld would never issue a code like that.
--
jgoerzen at complete dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Unrecognized opcode |SEVERE ERROR bootstrapping
|bootstrapping gcc on AIX |gcc on AIX 5/POWER
|5/POWER |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] SEVERE ERROR bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-18 19:01 ` [Bug bootstrap/24859] SEVERE ERROR " jgoerzen at complete dot org
@ 2005-11-18 20:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-21 1:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-13 19:58 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-18 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:00 -------
BFD: ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a(tinfo2.o): Unrecognized storage
can you alsotry to wipe out binutils ar also?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] SEVERE ERROR bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-18 20:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-21 1:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-13 19:58 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-21 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/24859] SEVERE ERROR bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER
2005-11-14 19:52 [Bug bootstrap/24859] New: Unrecognized opcode bootstrapping gcc on AIX 5/POWER jgoerzen at complete dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-11-21 1:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-13 19:58 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-13 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 19:58 -------
no feedback. apparently GNU Binutils is the problem.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread