public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-24985-4-Dx8Ly0Av9y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-24985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985

--- Comment #39 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-13 11:54:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Sounds good to me.  But I think GNU conventions require a location here?

Well, if that is a hard requirement, I can just suppress the caret. Or we can
just not print the "note: candidates are:". It seems superfluous info to me.

> > > t.C:1:6: note:   candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
> > >  void f();  void f(int,int);
> > >       ^
> > > t.C:1:17: note: void f(int, int)
> > >  void f();  void f(int,int);
> > >                  ^
> > > 
> > > and the 2nd note here looks wrong.
> > 
> > Could you explain why?
> 
> Because void f(int, int) is not of type "candidate expects 0 arguments" but
> it is of expects two which is duplicate of the following
> 
> t.C:1:17: note:   candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
>  void f();  void f(int,int);
>                  ^
> 
> But that's of course a different bug.

I see. The problem is that the output is meant to be read as (locations and
duplicated carets removed for clarity):

note: candidates are:
note: candidate #1 is void f()
 void f();  void f(int,int);
      ^
note:  candidate #1 expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
note: candidate #2 is void f(int, int)
 void f();  void f(int,int);
                 ^
note:   candidate #2 expects 2 arguments, 1 provided

that is, first print the candidate, then the reason for failure. If you read
again the original, the 2nd and 3rd notes go together, like the 4th and 5th, so
the output is correct (although I agree that quite confusing). That is why I
proposed:

note: candidate 'void f()' expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
 void f();  void f(int,int);
      ^
note:  candidate 'void f(int, int)' expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
 void f();  void f(int,int);
                 ^

(that is, instead of two notes per candidate, just one). Or we could number the
candidates like above.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-24985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-03-21 12:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-04 15:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-04 15:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-04 15:50 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-04-04 18:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-04 18:53 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-04 19:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-05 12:14 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-05 17:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-05 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-05 22:10 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-07 12:55 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-09 16:07 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-04-09 16:20 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-04-11  9:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-11  9:53 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-12 21:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-12 21:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13  2:26 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-04-13  9:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 10:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 11:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 11:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 11:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 11:56 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-04-13 11:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 12:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 12:16 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 12:19 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 12:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 12:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 19:06 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 19:41 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-13 22:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-14 10:54 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-22 16:36 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-04  0:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-13 22:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-11-22  4:01 [Bug c++/24985] New: Line info in diagnostics is very unfriendly igodard at pacbell dot net
2008-07-22  9:50 ` [Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-02 23:50 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-02 23:55 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-07-03  0:26 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-03  0:38 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-07-03 11:04 ` dave at treblig dot org
2009-10-07 16:57 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-07 17:07 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-07 18:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-07 21:26 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 17:34 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 18:51 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-24985-4-Dx8Ly0Av9y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).