public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:54:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-24985-4-QQMxbTp79W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-24985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #50 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-14 10:53:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #49) > Created attachment 27155 [details] > fix overload carets > > The patch that I am currently bootstrapping. I made a small change to the > output. It looks like this now: It bootstraps but, of course, there are a lot of failures. This one: > note: candidates are: I can remove in prune.exp but this: > note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided We probably want to match in messages. I am pretty sure there is a way to add a new { dg-notes-2 "note1" "note2" } which passes a regexp such as "[^\n]*note1[^\n]*\n[^\n]*note2[^\n]*" to process-message, but my Tcl foo is not strong enough.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 10:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-24985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2012-03-21 12:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-04 15:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-04 15:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-04 15:50 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-04-04 18:49 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-04 18:53 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-04 19:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-05 12:14 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-05 17:02 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-05 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-05 22:10 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-07 12:55 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 16:07 ` dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-04-09 16:20 ` dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-04-11 9:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-11 9:53 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-12 21:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-12 21:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 2:26 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-04-13 9:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 10:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 11:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 11:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 11:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 11:56 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 11:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 12:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 12:16 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 12:19 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 12:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 12:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 19:06 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 19:41 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-13 22:59 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-14 10:54 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-04-22 16:36 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-04 0:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-13 22:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2005-11-22 4:01 [Bug c++/24985] New: Line info in diagnostics is very unfriendly igodard at pacbell dot net 2008-07-22 9:50 ` [Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 23:50 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 23:55 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-03 0:26 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 0:38 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-03 11:04 ` dave at treblig dot org 2009-10-07 16:57 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 17:07 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 18:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 21:26 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 17:34 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 18:51 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-24985-4-QQMxbTp79W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).