From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-167858-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14312 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 10:36:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 14302 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2005 10:36:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:36:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/25015]  New: [gomp] Function names cannot be demangled due to ".omp_fn" suffix
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-25015-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg03344.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Compiling the following code snippet with "g++ -fopenmp -O -Wall"
I get a hosed error message:

============================
int i;

void foo()
{
#pragma omp parallel
    {
        int j;
        i = j;
    }
}
============================

bug.cc: In function 'void _Z3foov.omp_fn.0(void*)':
bug.cc:8: warning: 'j' is used uninitialized in this function

Because of the ".omp_fn.0" at the end of the function name the demangler
cannot process it.

Jakub, this is because of your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01644.html

Should we regard the ".omp_fn.0" suffix as an extension to the name
mangling scheme and teach the demangler how to handle those things?

This problem will probably also come up with debuggers etc.


-- 
           Summary: [gomp] Function names cannot be demangled due to
                    ".omp_fn" suffix
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic, monitored, openmp
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25015