From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20402 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2011 12:13:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 20215 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2011 12:13:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:13:20 +0000 From: "Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/25071] dummy argument larger than actual argument X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:47:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02623.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-01-25 12:12:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Reopening.. actually, I think this is a kind of error that should be caught at run-time with -fcheck=arguments (not to say bounds). I guess that's not so easy to implement, as it seem to imply that additional hidden subroutine arguments need to be passed around.