public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/25096] New: better diagnostic needed @ 2005-11-26 18:06 jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-06-04 9:39 ` [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2005-11-26 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs using GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.0 20051126 (prerelease) with '-g -pedantic -std=f95', I get a bad / no diagnostic for the following invalid code: TYPE T1 INTEGER :: I(2) END TYPE T1 TYPE(T1) :: D(4) DATA (D(i)%I,i=1,4) /8*0/ END -- Summary: better diagnostic needed Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25096 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data 2005-11-26 18:06 [Bug fortran/25096] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2006-06-04 9:39 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 16:28 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-04 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 09:38 ------- g95 emits a hard error on this one, while Intel accept it. $ g95 a.f90 In file a.f90:5 DATA (D(i)%I,i=1,4) /8*0/ 1 Error: Array section not allowed in DATA statement at (1) -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |accepts-invalid, diagnostic Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-06-04 09:38:57 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25096 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data 2005-11-26 18:06 [Bug fortran/25096] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-06-04 9:39 ` [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-05 16:28 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-05 18:56 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 18:23 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2008-12-05 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-12-05 16:26 ------- still fails with 4.4 -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2006-06-04 09:38:57 |2008-12-05 16:26:38 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25096 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data 2005-11-26 18:06 [Bug fortran/25096] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-06-04 9:39 ` [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 16:28 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2010-09-05 18:56 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 18:23 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-05 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 18:56 ------- just a question. why is this illegal ? it takes 8 values to initialize... --bud -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25096 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data 2005-11-26 18:06 [Bug fortran/25096] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-09-05 18:56 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-08 18:23 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2010-09-08 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-08 18:22 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > just a question. why is this illegal ? it is R528 in the section on the data statement of the F2003 standard that suggests this has to be a scalar-structure-component. Not so obvious why, if you ask me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25096 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-08 18:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-11-26 18:06 [Bug fortran/25096] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-06-04 9:39 ` [Bug fortran/25096] Non-conforming shapes of DATA object and data fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 16:28 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-05 18:56 ` bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 18:23 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).