public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/25113]  New: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0
@ 2005-11-27  2:30 kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-27 23:31 ` [Bug target/25113] " kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-27  2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Consider:

unsigned int bar (void);

void
foo (void)
{
  unsigned int a = bar ();
  a >>= 2;
  if (a == 0)
    bar ();
}

./cc1 -quiet -O2 -m5200 -fomit-frame-pointer generates

foo:
        move.l %a2,-(%sp)
        lea bar,%a2
        jbsr (%a2)
        lsr.l #2,%d0
        tst.l %d0
        jbne .L4
        jbsr (%a2)
.L4:
        move.l (%sp)+,%a2
        rts

Note that tst.l is not necessary because lsr.l sets the zero flag correctly.

See notice_update_cc and its frequent use of CC_STATUS_INIT.


-- 
           Summary: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on
                    cc0
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: m68k-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25113


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/25113] [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0
  2005-11-27  2:30 [Bug target/25113] New: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0 kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-27 23:31 ` kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-28  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-02-24 22:03 ` law at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-27 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25113


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/25113] [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0
  2005-11-27  2:30 [Bug target/25113] New: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0 kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-27 23:31 ` [Bug target/25113] " kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-28  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-02-24 22:03 ` law at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-28  5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-28 05:06 -------
Confirmed, isn't it better just to convert m68k to a non cc0 target?


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-11-28 05:06:13
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25113


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/25113] [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0
  2005-11-27  2:30 [Bug target/25113] New: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0 kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-27 23:31 ` [Bug target/25113] " kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-28  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-24 22:03 ` law at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2010-02-24 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from law at redhat dot com  2010-02-24 22:02 -------
This was fixed by the cond-optab merge.  The redundant tst instruction is no
longer generated.


-- 

law at redhat dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25113


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-24 22:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-27  2:30 [Bug target/25113] New: [m68k] lshiftrt and some other insns are conservative on cc0 kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-27 23:31 ` [Bug target/25113] " kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-28  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-24 22:03 ` law at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).