public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
@ 2005-12-04 19:50 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 19:52 ` [Bug testsuite/25253] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.0/objdir/gcc/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106
-6.c -O1 -fdump-tree-optimized -fno-show-column -S -o 20031106-6.s
(timeou
t = 300)
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
$ cat 20031106-6.c.t93.optimized
;; Function foo (foo)
Analyzing Edge Insertions.
foo (r)
{
struct s temp_struct3;
struct s temp_struct2;
struct s temp_struct1;
struct s r___0;
<bb 0>:
r___0 = r;
temp_struct1 = r___0;
temp_struct2 = temp_struct1;
temp_struct3 = temp_struct2;
<retval> = temp_struct3;
return <retval>;
}
2005-12-02 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c: Remove XFAIL.
--
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times
temp_struct 0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 19:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 19:52 -------
Confirmed on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu also, looks like Richard removed the wrong
xfail from the testcase.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|middle-end |testsuite
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC build triplet|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-12-04 19:52:21
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 19:52 ` [Bug testsuite/25253] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 20:01 -------
*** Bug 25237 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 19:52 ` [Bug testsuite/25253] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 20:29 -------
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0 (!)
can it be you run the mainline testsuite with a 4.0 compiler?
I get for
/space/rguenther/obj/obj1/gcc/xgcc -B/space/rguenther/obj/obj1/gcc/
/space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c -O1
-fdump-tree-optimized -fno-show-column -S -o 20031106-6.s
;; Function foo (foo)
Analyzing Edge Insertions.
foo (r)
{
int r$b;
int r$a;
char r$d;
<bb 0>:
r$b = r.b;
r$a = r.a;
r$d = r.d;
<retval>.m = r.m;
<retval>.b = r$b;
<retval>.a = r$a;
<retval>.d = r$d;
return <retval>;
}
so, no temp_struct. I am confused.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 20:34 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0 (!)
> can it be you run the mainline testsuite with a 4.0 compiler?
directory names don't matter. As I said I could reproduce this on
x86_64-linux-gnu also.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 20:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 20:35 -------
It passes for me on i686 and x86_64 (it should be really target independent).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 20:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 20:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:46 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 20:41 -------
Well, I'll take care of it somehow. Still trying to reproduce it.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-04 19:52:21 |2005-12-04 20:41:56
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 20:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 20:46 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-12-04 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2005-12-04 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-04 20:46 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times
temp_struct 0
> /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.0 (!)
>
> can it be you run the mainline testsuite with a 4.0 compiler?
Nope:
dave@hiauly6:~/gnu/gcc-4.0/objdir/gcc$ ./xgcc -B./ -v
Reading specs from ./specs
Target: hppa-linux
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-shared
--prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.1.0
--with-local-prefix=/home/dave/opt/gnu --enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --host=hppa-linux --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,java,ada
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20051203 (experimental)
> so, no temp_struct. I am confused.
I just reran the command and got the same result as reported.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 20:46 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2005-12-04 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 21:29 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-02-14 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-04 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-04 21:09 -------
Can you attach the result of -fdump-tree-sra-all for your system?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-04 21:29 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-02-14 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2005-12-04 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-04 21:29 -------
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times
temp_struct 0
> Can you attach the result of -fdump-tree-sra-all for your system?
Here it is.
Dave
------- Comment #10 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-04 21:29 -------
Created an attachment (id=10404)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10404&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/25253] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-04 21:29 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2006-02-14 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-14 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 14:36 -------
This is fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25253
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-14 14:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-04 19:50 [Bug middle-end/25253] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031106-6.c scan-tree-dump-times temp_struct 0 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 19:52 ` [Bug testsuite/25253] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 20:46 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-12-04 21:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-04 21:29 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-02-14 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).