public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses match Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 21:54:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-25290-4-btpzZ5reIi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-25290-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #34 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #22) > Without load/store handling, here are the following optimizations that > either can move to match.pd already or need some extra work to do it: > > * value_replacement: need to handle !single_non_singleton_phi_for_edges case > and more than one feeder statement (2 max according to the current > definition) There is a secondary part to value_replacement which requires more work than just working on the phi. I have to think of how to handle that. > * cond_removal_in_popcount_clz_ctz_pattern: need 2 feeder statements and > builtin call handling for feeder statements > > > * two_value_replacement: recored as PR 100958, it can move already Handled. > * abs_replacement: needs PROP_gimple_lswitch so we don't change if > statements early enough > ** I think majority of the abs handling is already in match.pd. This is handled. > * minmax_replacement: has some handling of comparisions which might not be > in the match.pd patterns already. needs PROP_gimple_lswitch also. > ** The handling of: > if (a <= u) > b = MAX (a, d); > x = PHI <b, u> > needs to moved too. > > > For the ones which cannot move There is a new part of minmax which I have a patch for but there is one part missing still (recorded in PR 101024) > * factor_out_conditional_conversion: will never move, though it needs > improvement and moved already (PR 56223 and PR 13563) I have an implementation which moves this over to using gimple_match_op (which I need to a few testcases for it). Though some of this maybe should move over to match ... > * spaceship_replacement: cannot move to match.pd depends on use afterwards > which is not hard to deal with in a match pattern. I have to look at what is done for spaceship and maybe merge it in with what is done for value_replacement (comparison after the phi) since they implement a similar optimization.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 21:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-25290-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2012-01-21 22:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 0:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-19 9:43 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-05 15:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-11-06 4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-15 4:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses match pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-16 0:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-01 18:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-01 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-05 1:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-08 22:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-08 22:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-08 23:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-09 7:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2021-06-23 22:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-06 7:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-18 21:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-05 19:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-10 5:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-10 7:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-27 2:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-05 6:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-21 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-19 1:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-02 21:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-25290-4-btpzZ5reIi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).