public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions
[not found] <bug-25322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-07-24 0:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-24 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 12 by r12-298; there is a testcase already.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions
2005-12-08 23:05 [Bug c++/25322] New: " cfranz at aldon dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-10 16:25 ` jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org
@ 2006-05-11 23:27 ` cfranz at aldon dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cfranz at aldon dot com @ 2006-05-11 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from cfranz at aldon dot com 2006-05-11 23:27 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Would someone mind specifying what section of the standard this violates? We
> have a codebase that makes heavy use of (3).
Section 9.5. Furthermore, I was basing cases 2, 4, and 6 on the following:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#359
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions
2005-12-08 23:05 [Bug c++/25322] New: " cfranz at aldon dot com
2005-12-08 23:36 ` [Bug c++/25322] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-09 5:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2006-03-10 16:25 ` jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org
2006-05-11 23:27 ` cfranz at aldon dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org @ 2006-03-10 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org 2006-03-10 16:25 -------
Would someone mind specifying what section of the standard this violates? We
have a codebase that makes heavy use of (3).
--
jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys
| |dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions
2005-12-08 23:05 [Bug c++/25322] New: " cfranz at aldon dot com
2005-12-08 23:36 ` [Bug c++/25322] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-09 5:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-03-10 16:25 ` jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org
2006-05-11 23:27 ` cfranz at aldon dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2005-12-09 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-12-09 05:20 -------
Confirmed. We should at least complain about cases 1, 3, 5. As does,
incidentally, icc with -Xc -ansi.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-12-09 05:20:59
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions
2005-12-08 23:05 [Bug c++/25322] New: " cfranz at aldon dot com
@ 2005-12-08 23:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-09 5:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-08 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 23:36 -------
Hmm, I actually want to say that case 2, 4, and 6 are actually valid (But I
have not looked at the standard) as anonymous types are special.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Known to fail| |2.95.3 3.0.4 3.2.3 3.4.0
| |3.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25322
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-24 0:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-25322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-07-24 0:13 ` [Bug c++/25322] ISO compliance of defining structs in anonymous unions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2005-12-08 23:05 [Bug c++/25322] New: " cfranz at aldon dot com
2005-12-08 23:36 ` [Bug c++/25322] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-09 5:21 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-03-10 16:25 ` jvalenzu at infinite-monkeys dot org
2006-05-11 23:27 ` cfranz at aldon dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).