public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libfortran/25340] New: Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record"
@ 2005-12-10 16:33 fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 16:55 ` [Bug libfortran/25340] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-10 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PR 25139 is in fact two different bugs, so I open this PR to separate them.
$ cat a.f90
integer :: i = 1
open(11,status="replace",form="unformatted")
read(11,end=1008) i
1008 continue
read(11,end=1011) i
1011 continue
end
$ gfortran a.f90 && ./a.out
At line 5 of file a.f90
Fortran runtime error: Read past ENDFILE record
--
Summary: Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25340
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/25340] Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record"
2005-12-10 16:33 [Bug libfortran/25340] New: Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record" fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-10 16:55 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-11 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-04 8:36 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-10 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 16:55 -------
What is the bug?
9.4.1.6 End-of-file branch
If an end-of-file condition (9.4.3) occurs and no error condition (9.4.3)
occurs during execution of an input statement that contains an END= specifier
(1) Execution of the input statement terminates,
(2) If the file specified in the input statement is an external file,
it
is positioned after the endfile record.
So, after the first read(11,end=1008), the file is positioned "after the
endfile
record." Your second read(11,end=1011) is reading past the ENDFILE record,
which is what the runtime error says.
Now, if your second read statement had been read(11,err=1011), then everything
should work out.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25340
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/25340] Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record"
2005-12-10 16:33 [Bug libfortran/25340] New: Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record" fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 16:55 ` [Bug libfortran/25340] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-11 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-04 8:36 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-11 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-11 10:52 -------
So, following Steven's question on c.l.f, this code is illegal.
Most compilers report an EOF error (including Intel and g77), and branch if an
END tag is present. I think the error issued by gfortran currently is better
("Read past ENDFILE record"), ie more precise.
If people provide an END tag in the I/O statement, what do we want to do? I am
in favour of throwing an error, and not branching silently. I know (from c.l.f)
Brook thinks the same. I think we can close this as INVALID if you agree,
Steven.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25340
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/25340] Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record"
2005-12-10 16:33 [Bug libfortran/25340] New: Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record" fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 16:55 ` [Bug libfortran/25340] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-11 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-04 8:36 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-04 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-04 08:36 -------
Well, I'm closing this one as invalid. Steve, if you disagree, feel free to
reopen it.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25340
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-04 8:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-10 16:33 [Bug libfortran/25340] New: Runtime error: "Read past ENDFILE record" fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 16:55 ` [Bug libfortran/25340] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-11 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-04 8:36 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).