public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
@ 2005-12-27 19:31 dir at lanl dot gov
2005-12-27 20:58 ` [Bug fortran/25578] " sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dir at lanl dot gov @ 2005-12-27 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The 20051227 version of gfortran has 144 new testsuite failures as compared to
the 2005121 version -
Test Run By dir on Tue Dec 27 11:07:49 2005
Native configuration is powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0
=== gfortran tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /usr/local/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file
for target.
Using /usr/local/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for
target.
Using /Users/dir/gfortran/gcc/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /Users/dir/gfortran/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/int_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_4.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nested_modules_1.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/real_const_2.f90 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/947.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/complex_1.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dcomplex.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-numeric.f execution test
Running /Users/dir/gfortran/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect.exp ...
Running
/Users/dir/gfortran/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/compile.exp
...
Running
/Users/dir/gfortran/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/execute.exp
...
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/cmplx.f90 execution, -Os
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_dotprod.f90 execution, -Os
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_minmax.f90 execution, -Os
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_mod_ulo.f90 execution, -Os
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/math.f90 execution, -Os
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/parameter_2.f90 execution, -Os
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O0
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O1
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O2
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/power.f90 execution, -Os
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 10856
# of unexpected failures 152
# of expected failures 7
# of unsupported tests 42
/Users/dir/gfortran/ibin/stage3-gcc/testsuite/../gfortran version 4.2.0
20051227 (experimental)
--
Summary: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite
failures since 2005121
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dir at lanl dot gov
GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25578] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
@ 2005-12-27 20:58 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-12-27 21:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu @ 2005-12-27 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-12-27 20:58 -------
If you've only updated the source in gcc/fortran and libgfortran, then you
need to do
cd gcc/testsuite
svn update
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
2005-12-27 20:58 ` [Bug fortran/25578] " sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
@ 2005-12-27 21:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-27 21:46 ` dir at lanl dot gov
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-27 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 21:13 -------
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01828.html
This is not a fortran front-end issue but a miscompiling of the fortran
front-end.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bonzini at gnu dot org
Severity|normal |blocker
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|fortran |rtl-optimization
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC build triplet| |powerpc-*-*
GCC host triplet|powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0 |powerpc-*-*
GCC target triplet| |powerpc-*-*
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-12-27 21:13:33
date| |
Summary|gfortran version 4.2.0 |[4.2 Regression] gfortran
|20051227 - 144 new testsuite|version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144
|failures since 2005121 |new testsuite failures since
| |2005121
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
2005-12-27 20:58 ` [Bug fortran/25578] " sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-12-27 21:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-27 21:46 ` dir at lanl dot gov
2005-12-28 15:46 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dir at lanl dot gov @ 2005-12-27 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from dir at lanl dot gov 2005-12-27 21:46 -------
This was after a complete new download and rebuild.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-27 21:46 ` dir at lanl dot gov
@ 2005-12-28 15:46 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2005-12-29 7:53 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2005-12-28 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-28 15:46 -------
I will be able to fix this at the beginning of January. If anybody wants to
revert my combine.c patch before that, go ahead.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-28 15:46 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-29 7:53 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2005-12-30 5:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2005-12-29 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-29 07:53 -------
I had an obvious fix yesterday but I had no time to bootstrap/regtest it. So
if possible please don't revert...
The reduced C testcase is
int f(int x)
{
return x >> 31 ? -1 : 1;
}
The MPFR_SIGN macro (invoked via mpfr_set) is miscompiled.
Paolo
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-27 21:13:33 |2005-12-29 07:53:52
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-29 7:53 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-30 5:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-30 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 05:45 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> int f(int x)
> {
> return x >> 31 ? -1 : 1;
> }
And we are missing an optimization here.
Right now (well before this patch) we optimization it as:
(- (((unsigned)x)>>31))|1
we we can optimize it as:
(x>>31)|1
I will file a bug about this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-01-04 16:51 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
2006-01-04 16:52 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2006-01-03 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-03 14:58 -------
patch committed
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-30 5:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-03 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-03 14:58 -------
Subject: Bug 25578
Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Jan 3 14:58:05 2006
New Revision: 109281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109281
Log:
gcc:
2006-01-03 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
PR rtl-optimization/25578
* combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx, force_to_mode): Don't
pass a parameter to simplify_shift_const if changing ASHIFTRT
to LSHIFTRT.
gcc/testsuite:
2006-01-03 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
PR rtl-optimization/25578
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20060102-1.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20060102-1.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/combine.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-04 16:51 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
2006-01-04 16:52 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: uttamp at us dot ibm dot com @ 2006-01-04 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-04 16:51 -------
*** Bug 25657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
uttamp at us dot ibm dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-01-04 16:51 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
@ 2006-01-04 16:52 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: uttamp at us dot ibm dot com @ 2006-01-04 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-04 16:52 -------
*** Bug 25656 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-04 16:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-27 19:31 [Bug fortran/25578] New: gfortran version 4.2.0 20051227 - 144 new testsuite failures since 2005121 dir at lanl dot gov
2005-12-27 20:58 ` [Bug fortran/25578] " sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2005-12-27 21:13 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/25578] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-27 21:46 ` dir at lanl dot gov
2005-12-28 15:46 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2005-12-29 7:53 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2005-12-30 5:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-03 14:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-01-04 16:51 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
2006-01-04 16:52 ` uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).