public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/25663] New: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Parses operator() call as declarator
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-25663-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
The following is rejected now as of a change between r109062 and r109079
with "error: invalid declarator" on the 2nd last line.
template <class T>
struct ScalarCode
{
ScalarCode(const T&);
template <class A, class B>
void operator()(const A&, const B&);
};
template <int Dim>
struct CflFunctor
{
CflFunctor(bool omrot, bool vis_f);
};
struct Bar {};
void foo(bool omrot, bool vis_f, const Bar& x, const Bar& y)
{
ScalarCode<CflFunctor<3> >(CflFunctor<3>(omrot, vis_f))(x, y);
}
--
Summary: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Parses operator() call as
declarator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25663
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 9:14 rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-01-04 12:07 ` [Bug c++/25663] [4.0/4.1/4.2 " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-04 12:10 ` [Bug c++/25663] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Trouble parsing nested templated constructor calls rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-04 12:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-04 12:21 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-13 21:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-14 4:56 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2006-01-14 5:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-14 10:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-14 12:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-14 18:44 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2006-01-14 18:49 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2006-01-15 0:56 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-15 0:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-15 0:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-15 0:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-25663-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).