[Bug fortran/25685] New: Accepts invalid code for Fortran 90

[Bug fortran/25685] New: Accepts invalid code for Fortran 90

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

The following code is invalid code but it is valid F95 code:
subroutine a(p)
  type t
    integer :: t1
  end type
  type(t) :: p
  p%t1 = 42
end subroutine
------
lahey's fortran front-end gives:
FATAL -- Derived-type dummy argument must be accessed by use or host
association or have the
SEQUENCE property (see "SEQUENCE Statement" in your Fortran 90 language
reference).


-- 
           Summary: Accepts invalid code for Fortran 90
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25685

[Bug fortran/25685] Accepts invalid code for Fortran 90

[kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-22 00:56 -------
Andrew,

Are you sure?  NAG's compiler compiles the code, as does gfortran.
Lahey's checker when I gave it the code gives

Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 Source Check Output

Compiling program unit a at line 1:
Encountered 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 informations in file SOURCE.F90.
Compiling file SOURCE.F90.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25685

[Bug fortran/25685] Accepts invalid code for Fortran 90

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-22 01:03 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Andrew,
> Are you sure?  NAG's compiler compiles the code, as does gfortran.
> Lahey's checker when I gave it the code gives
> Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 Source Check Output

This was from Lahey's Fortran 90 compiler.  I think it is valid F95 but invalid
F90.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25685

[Bug fortran/25685] Accepts invalid code for Fortran 90

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-11 21:20 -------
Actually this is still a dup of bug 22571.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22571 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25685