From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 999B238708FD; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:33:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 999B238708FD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1598538837; bh=ko8CZ5MOgx/pKMYJEOU+9LEZuBfVkLW/F6EcBXeW/nw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SmhiYTihF22GHmIxggtXV3UTVmB7LawaB4CM1T43UXxi9ZkYX478JCoz42oimbJ8z pJSkI5R+r+WmisqJu6S4HTOAK6UqMIwF2j6al9fyPbKiuZ923iY0SrbFM0PwSbZK6H RNqLJFHtUt4v/WYb3V6aJQ8bUbVcTLFiYZ9yRacY= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/25814] Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:33:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.0.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:33:57 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25814 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #16) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #15) > > David, presumably you're not working on this at the moment? > You're correct. Sorry about that. Switching back from ASSIGNED to NEW; > resetting assignee to default No worries. I'm interested in this but won't assign until I have at least a WIP patch.=