public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/26142] New: global debug namespace clashes everywhere Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-26142-12049@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) the namespace debug = std::__gnu_debug; from debug/debug.h (which is pulled in by almost every STL header) causes quite some clashes and is a huge PITA, as debug is often a user application namespace or function. why can't this be inside the std:: namespace or at least not be pulled in by default? (without explicitely including this header, or even using some define?) this seems a violation of namespace cleanness to me. is this really defined in ISO C++? -- Summary: global debug namespace clashes everywhere Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26142
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-07 0:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-02-07 0:16 mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2006-02-07 0:46 ` [Bug libstdc++/26142] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 5:43 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 14:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 14:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 20:59 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-08 21:42 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 4:31 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 5:07 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 17:17 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 18:53 ` mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 1:42 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-26142-12049@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).