public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-07 13:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-11 3:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-07 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 13:44 -------
This is a regression as the document is out of date now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|OpenMP extensions to the C |[4.2 Regression] OpenMP
|language is not documented |extensions to the C language
| |is not documented
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
@ 2006-02-07 13:44 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-07 13:44 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 more replies)
0 siblings, 20 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-07 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I noticed that the OpenMP extensions are not documented in the normal spot for
extensions in the "Extensions to the C Language Family" in the manual.
This is wrong as they are extensions we support to the C standard.
--
Summary: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation, openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-07 13:44 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-11 3:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 17:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-11 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 03:00 -------
It should be something like what XLC does at:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/lnxpcomp/v8v101/topic/com.ibm.xlcpp8l.doc/compiler/ref/ruprpdir.htm#RUPRPDIR
Which is actually much better than what is even in the current GCC docs which
is nothing even at the toplevel of extensions that GCC supports.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-11 03:00:09
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-07 13:44 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-11 3:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-04 17:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 18:04 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-04 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:33 -------
Yes, there should at least be a reference to online information about OpenMP in
our manual. At this is one of the major new features in 4.2, it should
definitely be documented. Diego, would you be able to put a pointer in the
manual?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-04 17:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-04 18:04 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-04 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:03 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Diego, would you be able to put a pointer in the manual?
>
There are two references to the OpenMP API already. One in the documentation
of -fopenmp, the other with the documentation of the OpenMP gimple codes. I
don't think we need to duplicate API documentation when so much external
documentation is available.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-04 18:04 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-17 0:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:23 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:06 -------
I agree that since there is a reference to the specification in -fopenmp it is
not necessary to do more to document OpenMP in our manual. (If we have
extensions to OpenMP they should be documented, but that's another issue.)
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-17 0:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-17 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-17 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:20 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I agree that since there is a reference to the specification in -fopenmp it is
> not necessary to do more to document OpenMP in our manual. (If we have
> extensions to OpenMP they should be documented, but that's another issue.)
The current situtation with OpenMP is not the same as the rest of the
documentation. "Extensions to the C Language Family" is were extensions to the
language STANDARD are documented, if they are not, then how would someone know
what the extensions are?
Also -fopenmp is not an option to control "Code Generation Conventions" but
instead the language which is accepted so it should be listed in "Options
Controlling C Dialect" (and maybe "Options Controlling C++ Dialect.").
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
Summary|[4.2 Regression] OpenMP |[4.2 Regression] OpenMP
|extensions to the C language|extensions to the C language
|is not documented |is not documented or
| |doumented in the wrong spot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-17 0:23 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-17 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-17 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:23 -------
Also the pragmas should be listed under:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Pragmas.html#Pragmas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-17 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-17 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-17 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:26 -------
Also we list extensions to C89 which are in C99 too so documenting this in
"Extensions to the C Language Family" is the correct thing to do.
And nothing links directly to the spec, I have to go through another web page
to get what each pargma does which is wrong, OUR document should be more
complete instead of the current situation where it is half done.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-17 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-17 0:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:59 ` [Bug c/26154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-17 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:28 -------
Andrew --
Since you're unwilling to close this PR, I'll leave it open. However, it's P5;
I trust OpenMP users to be able to figure out how to find the OpenMP pragmas.
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P1 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-17 0:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-17 0:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-29 9:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-17 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:49 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Andrew --
>
> Since you're unwilling to close this PR, I'll leave it open. However, it's P5;
> I trust OpenMP users to be able to figure out how to find the OpenMP pragmas.
Lets look at it a different way, how easy is it for a GCC user to see that GCC
supports OpenMP. It is hard because they have to look at the wrong section to
find it does. Yes the news section on the main web page says it exists but
that is not an excuse for having not good documentation. Let me also point out
there are other extensions which are more documented than OpenMP even ones
which are part of a standard like
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Long-Long.html#Long-Long
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Hex-Floats.html#Hex-Floats
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Compound-Literals.html#Compound-Literals
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Mixed-Declarations.html#Mixed-Declarations
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Initializers.html#Initializers
Should I continue or can I say that OpenMP is just poorly documented and is
inconsistent with the rest of GCC and is really an undocumented extension that
can be removed still?
Even TLS is not documented the way OpenMP is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Thread_002dLocal.html#Thread_002dLocal
In fact it gives exact edits to the real standard.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P5 |P3
Summary|[4.2 Regression] OpenMP |OpenMP extensions to the C
|extensions to the C language|language is not documented
|is not documented or |or doumented in the wrong
|doumented in the wrong spot |spot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-17 0:59 ` [Bug c/26154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-29 9:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-14 21:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-29 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-29 9:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-14 21:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-14 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2007-05-14 21:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-20 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:22 -------
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.2 |4.2.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-01 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:52 -------
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.3 |4.2.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-19 20:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:49 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-19 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 20:22 -------
4.2.4 is being released, changing milestones to 4.2.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.4 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-19 20:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 19:49 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 19:29 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:48 -------
Marking as regression again.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|OpenMP extensions to the C |[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|language is not documented |OpenMP extensions to the C
|or doumented in the wrong |language is not documented
|spot |or doumented in the wrong
| |spot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 19:49 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 19:29 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:16 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 19:29 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|OpenMP extensions to the C |OpenMP extensions to the C
|language is not documented |language is not documented
|or doumented in the wrong |or doumented in the wrong
|spot |spot
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 19:29 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:16 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-22 18:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-07 13:44 [Bug c/26154] New: OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-07 13:44 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-11 3:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 17:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-04 18:04 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:23 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-17 0:59 ` [Bug c/26154] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-29 9:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-14 21:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:49 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 19:29 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:16 ` [Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).