From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E35083858025; Tue,  8 Mar 2022 18:43:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E35083858025
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/26374] Compile failure on long double
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:43:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-26374-4-9qH7tMVZQH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26374-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:43:43 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26374

--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to beebe from comment #14)
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26374
>=20
> That is a really old one, from early 2006; I would have hoped that it
> had long since been repaired in gcc.
>=20
> However, I just checked my VM for CentOS 7 on PowerPC, and found this:

Well powerpc currently uses what is called double double for 128bit long
double. GCC does not know how to constant fold that nicely. But powerpc lin=
ux
targets are moving over to use standard 128bit IEEE long double and IIRC for
GCC 12 (or is it 13) will default to IEEE long double so this will be less =
of
an issue.=