From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-179235-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28898 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2006 08:06:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 28882 invoked by uid 48); 6 Mar 2006 08:06:20 -0000
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:06:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/26577]  New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size with volatile
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-26577-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00594.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

As reported here:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-03/msg00589.html

Confirmed. Fails since GCC 4.0.0.

However, this has nothing to do with templates or inline asm as the
reduced testcase shows:

==================================
struct A
{
    A(const A&);
    A& operator=(const A&);
    static void bar();
    void foo() volatile {}
    void baz() volatile;
};

void A::baz() volatile
{
    foo();
    bar();
}
==================================


-- 
           Summary: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size with
                    volatile
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26577