From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9325 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2011 22:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 9316 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2011 22:53:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_JS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:53:45 +0000 From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:03:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02539.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854 Joseph S. Myers changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iant at google dot com --- Comment #126 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-01-24 22:53:09 UTC --- Ian added decl_jump_unsafe though I've no idea if the performance is actually worse or better than with my previous implementation (that he rewrote in order to add various -Wc++-compat cases).