From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6812 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2011 15:19:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 6798 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2011 15:19:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:19:02 +0000 From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:53:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01808.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854 --- Comment #125 from Daniel Berlin 2011-01-18 15:18:25 UTC --- > > --- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-18 15:15:01 UTC --- >> >> This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers > It seems that they are used, just we do a lot of queries from > register_new_assert_for > according to my ^C GDB profiling. > Interesting, i wonder why et_splay shows up at all then.