public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/26989] [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
2006-04-02 16:08 [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-02 16:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-03 17:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-02 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |26984
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-02 16:08:46
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
@ 2006-04-02 16:08 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-02 16:08 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-02 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
As reported over here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01428.html
HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN is the wrong check and should not be used.
Since this was reported more than a week ago and nothing has been done I am
filing a bug report.
I am going add this is a regression as anonymous namespace was correctly marked
as hidden for a while on powerpc-darwin but is no longer.
--
Summary: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC)
use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-darwin7.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26989] [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
2006-04-02 16:08 [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-02 16:08 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-03 17:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 5:23 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-03 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 17:50 -------
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-04/msg00107.html
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon1.C scan-hidden private_extern[
\\t_]*_?_ZN.*1fEv
So we have a testsuite failure also :).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
2006-04-02 16:08 [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-02 16:08 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-03 17:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-07 5:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-23 4:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-23 4:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-07 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 05:23 -------
The patch which exposed this issue was reverted so this is no longer a
regression though it is still a bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2 Regression] C++ front- |C++ front-end (and others
|end (and others parts of |parts of GCC) use the wrong
|GCC) use the wrong check to |check to see if hidden
|see if hidden visibility is |visibility is there
|there |
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
2006-04-02 16:08 [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-07 5:23 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-23 4:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-23 4:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-23 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 03:51 -------
So what is the right check, then?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there
2006-04-02 16:08 [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-23 4:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-23 4:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-23 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 04:03 -------
I don't think there is one currently.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-23 4:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-02 16:08 [Bug c++/26989] New: [4.2 Regression] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-02 16:08 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-03 17:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 5:23 ` [Bug c++/26989] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-23 4:00 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-23 4:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).