public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/27074] New: Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu
@ 2006-04-07 12:42 amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/27074] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 18:07 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-07 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-04/msg00055.html
--
Summary: Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27074
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug bootstrap/27074] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2006-04-07 12:42 [Bug bootstrap/27074] New: Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-07 15:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 18:07 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-07 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 15:11 -------
File this first with gdb as it is gdb's sources which are have the warning in
it, if they say the warning is bogus, file a real bug report with the
preprocessed source.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27074
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug bootstrap/27074] Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2006-04-07 12:42 [Bug bootstrap/27074] New: Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/27074] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-07 18:07 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-07 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 18:07 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> File this first with gdb as it is gdb's sources which are have the warning in
> it, if they say the warning is bogus, file a real bug report with the
> preprocessed source.
When you look at the code, the warning is obviously spurious.
But we know that uninitialized warnings cannot be made reliable, so it is
unclear if you can call it bogus.
With the bootstrap building gdb with -Wuninitailized -Werror, we are basically
asking for trouble.
AFAIK we have not documented any conding standards that tell how to write
code that can be compiled successfully with these options, so it seems
disingenious to put the blame on the code in gdb.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27074
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-07 18:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-07 12:42 [Bug bootstrap/27074] New: Bootstrap fails on i686-pc-linux-gnu amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 15:11 ` [Bug bootstrap/27074] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-07 18:07 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).