From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20274 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2012 06:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 20264 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2012 06:36:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_VT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:36:06 +0000 From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/27139] Optimize double INT->FP->INT conversions with -ffast-math Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:36:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: marc.glisse at normalesup dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg02075.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27139 Marc Glisse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marc.glisse at normalesup | |dot org --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-24 06:35:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > int test (int a) > { > return (double) a; > } I just wrote the very same testcase today, extracted from my code... > Produces: > > cvtsi2sd %edi, %xmm0 > cvttsd2si %xmm0, %eax > ret Still does. Did you have any idea how to handle it? > However, following code does the same (at least for -ffast-math): > movl %edi, %eax > ret I don't think -ffast-math is relevant here, on x86 the int->double conversion is exact hence the reverse has to be as well. (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed, I doubt this shows up that much anyways. Just posting to mention that it does show up...