public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/27338] Violation of mips o64 ABI
[not found] <bug-27338-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-01-10 18:34 ` sje at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-14 19:25 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-10 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338
Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-10 18:34:11 UTC ---
Richard, has the need for any documentation change been removed by the age of
this defect? Perhaps it should just be closed now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/27338] Violation of mips o64 ABI
[not found] <bug-27338-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-01-10 18:34 ` [Bug target/27338] Violation of mips o64 ABI sje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-14 19:25 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-14 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338
rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-14 19:25:36 UTC ---
Yeah, trh(In reply to comment #2)
> Richard, has the need for any documentation change been removed by the age of
> this defect? Perhaps it should just be closed now.
Yeah, that would probably be best. I hang my head in shame at how
long it's taken me to do nothing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/27338] Violation of mips o64 ABI
2006-04-27 13:11 [Bug target/27338] New: " niva at niisi dot msk dot ru
@ 2006-05-19 15:11 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-19 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-19 15:10 -------
The use of $f14 was an unintentional historical accident,
not a deliberate decision. It has since been "fixed".
I realise this isn't going to be very helpful to you,
but you should just treat 3.4 and 4.x as being
ABI-incompatible as far as o64 is concerned.
The web page should be updated; I'll assign myself
to this bug for that reason.
Richard
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-05-19 15:10:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27338
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-14 19:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-27338-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-01-10 18:34 ` [Bug target/27338] Violation of mips o64 ABI sje at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-14 19:25 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2006-04-27 13:11 [Bug target/27338] New: " niva at niisi dot msk dot ru
2006-05-19 15:11 ` [Bug target/27338] " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).