public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dirkmoermans at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/27339] New: defining out-of-class specialization of value template parameter with private type Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:28:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-27339-12611@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) Following code does not compile with gcc 4.1. It compiles with gcc 3.4.0 and gcc 4.0.2 and comeau online. ============================= class A { private: enum private_enum {a}; template<A::private_enum v> // OK struct B { void bm(); }; public: void am() { B<a> instance; //OK instance.bm(); } }; template<A::private_enum v> // FAIL void A::B<v>::bm(){} ============================= The error message is: a.cc:4: error: 'enum A::private_enum' is private a.cc:19: error: within this context If the member template function gets defined inline, the code compiles. I don't have the c++ standard available, but a technicality like an inline/outline definition should have no impact on the validity of the code imho. The same error occurrs if the enum gets replaced by a function template typedef, or if the inner-class gets replaced by a member-function-template. A related bug is 10849 -- Summary: defining out-of-class specialization of value template parameter with private type Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dirkmoermans at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27339
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-27 16:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-04-27 16:28 dirkmoermans at gmail dot com [this message] 2006-04-27 19:29 ` [Bug c++/27339] [4.1/4.2 Regression]defining " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 16:29 ` [Bug c++/27339] [4.1/4.2 Regression] out-of-class definition " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 16:17 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:31 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 23:16 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 5:41 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 5:43 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 14:56 ` [Bug c++/27339] [4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 14:56 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-27339-12611@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).