From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-184764-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7971 invoked by alias); 4 May 2006 01:23:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 7946 invoked by uid 48); 4 May 2006 01:23:09 -0000
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 01:23:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c/27413]  New: compiling with -ansi puts in broken version of atanh
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-27413-12630@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "anonymous at mailinator dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

If you use -ansi to compile a program that uses the atanh function, the
compiler somehow replaces atanh with a function that just returns 0.  I think
the compiler should either put in the correct atanh function or refuses to
link/compile.  The following shows how to reproduce the bug:


$ cat > bug.c

#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main() { printf("atanh(%f) returns %f!\n",.32,atanh(.32)); return 0;}

$ gcc bug.c -o bug.exe -lm && bug.exe
atanh(0.320000) returns 0.331647!
$ gcc -ansi bug.c -o bug.exe -lm && bug.exe
atanh(0.320000) returns 0.000000!


-- 
           Summary: compiling with -ansi puts in broken version of atanh
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: anonymous at mailinator dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27413