From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-185691-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25344 invoked by alias); 12 May 2006 23:18:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 25323 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2006 23:18:32 -0000
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/27582]  New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid template parameter
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-27582-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg01247.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The following invalid testcase triggers an ICE since GCC 3.4.0:

===============================================
struct A
{
    template<int> void foo();
};

template<int N, void (A::*)() = &A::foo<N> > struct B {};

B<int> b;
===============================================

bug.cc:8: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template parameter list
for 'template<int N, void (A::* <anonymous>)()> struct B'
bug.cc:8: error:   expected a constant of type 'int', got 'int'
bug.cc:8: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_vec, have
error_mark in any_dependent_template_arguments_p, at cp/pt.c:12751
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]

Patch on the way.


-- 
           Summary: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid template
                    parameter
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27582